Ethics and environmental publications
‘‘Prostitution, Exploitation and Taboo,’ Philosophy 79 (1989) pp. 525–34.
Review of Objective Prescriptions, R. M. Hare. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999, in International Philosophical Quarterly, 2000, pp. 512-13.
‘Prostitution, Exploitation and Taboo’ extracts reprinted in What’s Wrong? Applied Ethicists and their Critics ed. David Boonin and Graham Oddie (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004). Second edition 2010, pp. 252–5.
‘Freud, Wollstonecraft, and Ecofeminism: A Defense of Liberal Feminism,’ Environmental Ethics 16 (1994) pp. 117–34.
‘Two Distinctions in Environmental Goodness,’ Environmental Values 5 (1996) pp. 31–46.
‘The Passions and the Imagination in Wollstonecraft's Theory of Moral Judgement,’ Utilitas 9 (1997) pp. 271–90.
‘De Sade, De Beauvoir and Dworkin,’ Australian Feminist Studies 15 (2000) pp. 69–80.
‘Distance, Divided Responsibility and Universalizability,’ The Monist 86:3 (2003) pp. 503–17.
‘A Moral Philosophy of their Own? The Moral and Political Thought of Eighteenth-Century British Women,’ The Monist 98:1 (2015) pp. 89–101.
‘An eco-centric proposal for setting a price on greenhouse gas emissions’ in Climate Change Ethics and the Non-human World ed. Brian Henning and Zach Walsh (Routledge, 2020), pp. 121–32.