‘Will the real Enlightenment historian please stand up? Catharine Macaulay versus David Hume,’ in Hume and the Enlightenment edited by Craig Taylor and Stephen Buckle (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2010), pp. 39–51.

‘When is a Contract Theorist not a Contract Theorist?’ in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes ed. Nancy Hirschmann and Joanne Wright (State Park: Penn State University Press, 2012), pp. 169–89.

‘Liberty and Virtue in Catharine Macaulay’s Enlightenment Philosophy,’ Intellectual History Review 22:3 (2012) pp. 411–26.

‘Macaulay and Democratic Culture,’ Skepsis (Suppl. vol.), XXII/iii (a), (ed.) G. Tsoukalas- A. Dimitrakopoulou, (2012) pp. 63-79.

‘Catharine Macaulay and Lætitia Barbauld: Two Eighteenth-Century “Republicans”’ in Political Ideas of Enlightenment Women; Virtue and Citizenship, ed. Lisa Curtis-Wendlandt, Paul Gibbard, and Karen Green, (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 157–72.

with Shannon Weekes, ‘Catharine Macaulay on the Will,’ History of European Ideas 39:3 (2013) pp. 409–25.

‘Reassessing the Impact of the “Republican Virago”,’ Redescriptions 19:1 (2016) pp. 29–48.

‘Catharine Macaulay’s French Connections,’ Eighteenth-Century Life 41:2 (2017) pp. 59–72.

‘Locke, Enlightenment, and Liberty in the Works of Catharine Macaulay and her Contemporaries’ in Women and Liberty, 1600-1800 ed. Jacqueline Broad and Karen Detlefson on Women and Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 82–94.

‘Catharine Macaulay’s Enlightenment Faith and Radical Politics,’ History of European Ideas, 44:1 (2018) pp. 35–44.

‘Jane Austen and Catharine Macaulay’, Persuasions: Journal of the North American Jane Austen Society 39 (2018) pp. 177–83.

‘Catharine Macaulay as Critic of Hume,’ in Rethinking the Enlightenment, ed Martin Lloyd and Geoff Bowden (Lanham, MA: Lexington Books, 2018), pp. 113-130.

The Correspondence of Catharine Macaulay (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019)

Catharine Macaulay’s Republican Enlightenment (New York: Routledge, 2020).

‘On Getting a Reputation: Jane Austen and Catharine Macaulay,’ Sensibilities 60 (June, 2020) pp. 28–39.

‘Catharine Macaulay’ in Bloomsbury History: Theory and Method  https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350970830.032

‘Catharine Macaulay and the Reception of Hobbes in the Eighteenth Century’ in A Companion to Hobbes edited by Marcus P. Adams (Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2021), pp. 492–504.

‘Catharine Macaulay and the Concept of Radical Enlightenment’, Intellectual History Review 31:1 (2021) pp. 165–80.

‘Restoring Catharine Macaulay’s Enlightenment Republicanism?’ Dialogue and Universalism 31:3 (2021) pp. 39–57.

‘Macaulay, Catharine’ in Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy Dordrecht: Springer (Published March 2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_843-1

‘Catharine Macaulay and Samuel Johnson, or A Conversation at a Coffee Table’, 2017 Fleeman Lecture, The Johnson Society of Australia 18 (August) 2022.

‘Catharine Macaulay and her Influence on Mary Wollstonecraft’ in The Routledge Handbook of Women and Early Modern European Philosophy, edited by Karen Detlefsen and Lisa Shapiro (Routledge, 2023), pp. 546–57.